New competitor for Indigo ? P.U.R.E.

Discuss stuff not about Indigo.
User avatar
delle
Posts: 175
Joined: Fri Apr 13, 2007 11:32 pm
Location: Italy

New competitor for Indigo ? P.U.R.E.

Post by delle » Thu Nov 05, 2009 5:46 am

P.U.R.E. stands for Physically-based Unbiased Rendering Engine.

See here

:mrgreen: :wink:

User avatar
dakiru
Indigo 100
Posts: 747
Joined: Mon Jun 22, 2009 6:51 am

Re: New competitor for Indigo ? P.U.R.E.

Post by dakiru » Thu Nov 05, 2009 7:17 am

"Substance" looks interesting :)

User avatar
Godzilla
Indigo 100
Posts: 985
Joined: Sat Jun 06, 2009 11:33 am

Re: New competitor for Indigo ? P.U.R.E.

Post by Godzilla » Thu Nov 05, 2009 8:02 am

Looks like it doesn't have any exporters available (?)

Also, I saw this on Nvidia's website yesterday, GPU-powered Physically-correct renderer:

http://www.nvidia.com/object/realityserver.html

Cheesestraws
Posts: 9
Joined: Sat Jun 27, 2009 8:26 am

Re: New competitor for Indigo ? P.U.R.E.

Post by Cheesestraws » Thu Nov 05, 2009 8:19 am

Interesting that it seems to be a descendant of Virtualight, which used to be quite popular some time ago.

The old Virtualight website seems to be down right now, but you can see it still here, he also wrote a MLT version here.

gagar
Posts: 21
Joined: Wed Sep 23, 2009 12:23 am
Location: England
Contact:

Re: New competitor for Indigo ? P.U.R.E.

Post by gagar » Thu Nov 05, 2009 8:22 am

dakiru wrote:"Substance" looks interesting :)
"Simplant" looks interesting as well: http://www.neuro-systems.net/documents/simplant.html

:lol:

User avatar
lycium
Posts: 1216
Joined: Wed Sep 12, 2007 7:46 am
Location: Leipzig, Germany
Contact:

Re: New competitor for Indigo ? P.U.R.E.

Post by lycium » Thu Nov 05, 2009 8:31 am

substance sounds like something i'd like to compete with ;)

in fact it sounds like a overloaded-marketing version of the software i've been writing for some years now...

User avatar
juan_irender
Indigo 100
Posts: 251
Joined: Tue Jun 23, 2009 12:37 pm
Location: Spain
3D Software: Cinema 4D

Re: New competitor for Indigo ? P.U.R.E.

Post by juan_irender » Thu Nov 05, 2009 11:16 am

Godzilla wrote:Looks like it doesn't have any exporters available (?)

Also, I saw this on Nvidia's website yesterday, GPU-powered Physically-correct renderer:

http://www.nvidia.com/object/realityserver.html
In fact, iray and Reality Server are products of Mental Images, wich is owned by NVidia.
C4D R18 Studio user
Blender user :D

User avatar
Borgleader
Posts: 2149
Joined: Mon Jun 16, 2008 10:48 am

Re: New competitor for Indigo ? P.U.R.E.

Post by Borgleader » Thu Nov 05, 2009 11:18 am

juan_irender wrote:
Godzilla wrote:Looks like it doesn't have any exporters available (?)

Also, I saw this on Nvidia's website yesterday, GPU-powered Physically-correct renderer:

http://www.nvidia.com/object/realityserver.html
In fact, iray and Reality Server are products of Mental Images, wich is owned by NVidia.
so its simply mental ray with a "gpu flavour" ?
benn hired a mercenary to kill my sig...

neo0.
Posts: 1784
Joined: Thu Feb 28, 2008 7:11 am
Location: the US of A

Re: New competitor for Indigo ? P.U.R.E.

Post by neo0. » Thu Nov 05, 2009 11:54 am

gagar wrote:
dakiru wrote:"Substance" looks interesting :)
"Simplant" looks interesting as well: http://www.neuro-systems.net/documents/simplant.html

:lol:
That looks like very interesting. I should go investigate.

User avatar
juan_irender
Indigo 100
Posts: 251
Joined: Tue Jun 23, 2009 12:37 pm
Location: Spain
3D Software: Cinema 4D

Re: New competitor for Indigo ? P.U.R.E.

Post by juan_irender » Thu Nov 05, 2009 8:56 pm

Borgleader wrote:
juan_irender wrote:
Godzilla wrote:Looks like it doesn't have any exporters available (?)

Also, I saw this on Nvidia's website yesterday, GPU-powered Physically-correct renderer:

http://www.nvidia.com/object/realityserver.html
In fact, iray and Reality Server are products of Mental Images, wich is owned by NVidia.
so its simply mental ray with a "gpu flavour" ?
No, iray is a new product, a GPU accelerated unbiased renderer:
http://www.mentalimages.com/products/iray.html
C4D R18 Studio user
Blender user :D

neo0.
Posts: 1784
Joined: Thu Feb 28, 2008 7:11 am
Location: the US of A

Re: New competitor for Indigo ? P.U.R.E.

Post by neo0. » Fri Nov 06, 2009 8:32 am

I don't know if I would call it a competitor. The lighting on either doesn't look as realistic as indigo, especially iray. In fact, if you look at their office scenes, it almost looks biased..

User avatar
dakiru
Indigo 100
Posts: 747
Joined: Mon Jun 22, 2009 6:51 am

Re: New competitor for Indigo ? P.U.R.E.

Post by dakiru » Fri Nov 06, 2009 9:55 am

neo0. wrote:I don't know if I would call it a competitor. The lighting on either doesn't look as realistic as indigo, especially iray. In fact, if you look at their office scenes, it almost looks biased..
I guess, it's about the rendering time in case of iray. Check this.

User avatar
juan_irender
Indigo 100
Posts: 251
Joined: Tue Jun 23, 2009 12:37 pm
Location: Spain
3D Software: Cinema 4D

Re: New competitor for Indigo ? P.U.R.E.

Post by juan_irender » Fri Nov 06, 2009 12:03 pm

Well, iray is (or may be) fast, but it isn´t a cheap rendering option. Reality Server is based on NVidia Tesla computers, a scalable computing solution.
Indigo is in another league, more flexible, more friendly, and... more unbiased :wink: .

Cheers!
C4D R18 Studio user
Blender user :D

User avatar
psor
1st Place Winner
Posts: 1295
Joined: Sun Jun 25, 2006 1:25 am
Location: Berlin
Contact:

Re: New competitor for Indigo ? P.U.R.E.

Post by psor » Fri Nov 06, 2009 4:03 pm

Not only that. Who knows how much horsepower they are using there. And when you see
Indigo, lux, maxwell, fry, ... blah ... on a lots of cores rendering over network you'll crap your
pants too for sure. How do I know? Stack-Studios had a software called RemoteMatador
which evolved into Felix and is using Maxwell as backend. David Rossmann aka daros,
always said something like "Manpower is much more expensive then hardware" and he is right.

I don't have the videos that show off rendering at the moment but take a look at Felix ...



Image Image

Image Image



Not to advertise his service but that's a quote ...
daros wrote: A test image (600x300 pixels) FELIX costs more 'or less 30 cents and usually takes 15 to 25 seconds.

image (1200 * 600) pixel cost about 2 euros and takes less than 1-4 minutes.

image (2000 * 1000) pixel cost about 7 euros and takes less than 2-6 minutes.

image (3000 * 2000) pixel costs roughly 14 euros and takes 4-15 minutes.

Here some more pictures and the thread at Treddi.com. And what I can say is, that a smart
person is doing something like that for luxrender now. Cause there is no license fee and much
more flexibility then all others can offer. So I keep smiling about iRay. ;)


My two cents. Stay flexible! 8)










take care
psor
"The sleeper must awaken"

User avatar
CTZn
Posts: 7240
Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 4:34 pm
Location: Paris, France

Re: New competitor for Indigo ? P.U.R.E.

Post by CTZn » Sat Nov 07, 2009 4:26 am

On-demand renderfarming is something Ono and Ben mentioned multiple times here already, it is certainly an option adding flexibility.
obsolete asset

Post Reply
17 posts

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 246 guests