"They came at night" w.i.p

arneoog · Post by **arneoog** » Mon Oct 02, 2006 6:30 am

the only thing you need to change is the background light to:

     <background> 
      <spectrum> 
         <rgb> 
            <rgb>1 1 1</rgb> 
         </rgb> 
      </spectrum> 
   </background>

eman7613 · Post by **eman7613** » Mon Oct 02, 2006 6:30 am

i tried get a, "SceneLoaderExcep: No 'spectrum' element found in background element." as my error.

for allt he indigo gurus here

Code: Select all


	<background>
		<radiance>0 0 0</radiance>
	</background>

oy, i dont know how many times ive gone back and changed "indego" to "indigo" >.<

EDIT: boy u got there fast, doing that right now

Roger · Post by **Roger** » Mon Oct 02, 2006 6:33 am

Hm, I've exported it (with the Indigo 0.6test1 Blender exporter) to 0.6 XML file. I've uploaded to my site. The file is here. It's about 1 mb. I must say I have done all my tests before with 0.5 and even though it seems to work (the new 0.6 export, and the Indigo 0.6 itsselve) I don't know if the results will be different. I certainly hope not. I've rendererd it for about an hour, and it looks pretty much the same, so I think it'l work fine.

Hope you'l menage to render it eman!

eman7613 · Post by **eman7613** » Mon Oct 02, 2006 6:36 am

ok, ll use that one. ill post a pic of how its doing in a few

eman7613 · Post by **eman7613** » Mon Oct 02, 2006 8:03 am

just to make sure this is turing out like it should be

still cooking

Roger · Post by **Roger** » Mon Oct 02, 2006 8:04 am

I'm going to bed now, it's 10 pm and I need to get up early. Never saw that while I was typing, there were two posts in the meantime

. Glad to know the difference in the 0.6 and 0.5 xml files is minimal. Now I can use old 0.5 xmls with the new 0.6 Indigo just by modifying them. Thanks.

Hope the render will be nice.

Thanks a lot for the effort. Hope I can mean something for you or this community (like I made tutorials for Blender's community) in appreciation.

Roger · Post by **Roger** » Mon Oct 02, 2006 8:06 am

Haha, again while I was posting...perhaps I'm a real slow typer

.

It's looking as it should I think! Cool!!! I certainly hope that the fella's hanging on the windowframe and the one on the stairs will be good visible in some more rendertime!

eman7613 · Post by **eman7613** » Mon Oct 02, 2006 12:39 pm

its at 1500 mutation per pixel and its still very noisy, is this normal for .6?

Roger · Post by **Roger** » Tue Oct 03, 2006 3:38 am

Ai, no, I don't think so... Isn't he done yet? Keeps it at low mutations?

eman7613 · Post by **eman7613** » Tue Oct 03, 2006 3:51 am

well im killing it right now, 5286 mutations is a lot for this much noise

i started it rendering on my desktop last night (its had 7 less hours) and it is already clearner (using .5). so im just goign to give it a few more and then well see.

mzungu · Post by **mzungu** » Tue Oct 03, 2006 4:43 am

eman7613 wrote:EDIT: fudge, school laptop is set to a network drive in cmd so cant try that were can i grab v.6?

can't you just change the current drive, like normal? (using the good ol' DOS C: command [for switching to the C drive]... ah, the windows generation. How quickly we forget our DOS commands, eh?

)

My crit on the WIP: It appears that you should scale the bump mapping on the wall down a little. Its a tad too large. As mentioned, I think a bump map on the floor, to match the seams in the parquet wood floor, would be a nice touch.

The lampshade is just sweet, tho. I'd love to see some kinda tute on how you tweaked this component. (Can't wait for an SSS implementation in Indigo to handle something like this, eh?)

eman7613 · Post by **eman7613** » Tue Oct 03, 2006 5:35 am

nope, im not an admin use and almost everything is blocked for me (i only know so many work arounds

) wont even let me make a bat file to use instead

desktop render post proc and non

Roger · Post by **Roger** » Tue Oct 03, 2006 5:48 am

Wow, thanks a lot already eman7613, that render is already much better than my poor pc would menage

he usually crashes before the image is grainless.

I hope the render you're doing now is going to be even better!

About the wall bumpmap, at my home the wall is as bumpmappish as this or perhaps worse, so persoanally I don't think that's off. I don't know how to give the floor a bumpmap, and the final image is already being rendered... so guess it's a but late for that.

Roger · Post by **Roger** » Tue Oct 03, 2006 5:52 am

Was the same time I post reply with you.

I must say the pics you posted before, guess those were made with 0.6 look better. They are a bit more green, but the light (from lamp to stairwayopening-top) look better than in the new 0.5 one.

Here is the older 0.6 render one, with a bit of post-pro by me.

Are you gonna leave it rendering? Should I do something?

eman7613 · Post by **eman7613** » Tue Oct 03, 2006 6:38 am

no, i gota go back to finishing my room

but i was planing on rednering it hires this thursday (im gonna be gone for a day so wont be using the computer) so i could use it as a background ;p. so feel free to make any changes befor then if u want.

"They came at night" w.i.p

Who is online