Indigo demo at some convention?

[Godzilla]

Editing my post is certainly one way to retort.

[pixie]

Editing my post is certainly one way to retort.

[fused]

Editing my post is certainly one way to retort.

I apologize for that :S

...

Wasnt me tho...

[Stinkie]

in the marketplace you need to be clearly identified as something

True, but that's not going to happen by adopting the same marketing angle everyone else uses.

[neo0.]

Speaking of marketing, won't indigo be the only free, full featured renderer to support GPU acceleration?

[pixie]

Speaking of marketing, won't indigo be the only free, full featured renderer to support GPU acceleration?

No???

[fused]

Speaking of marketing, won't indigo be the only free, full featured renderer to support GPU acceleration?

No???

at least more full featured than the other one... you know... the one with the bad aliasing...

[pixie]

Speaking of marketing, won't indigo be the only free, full featured renderer to support GPU acceleration?

No???

at least more full featured than the other one... you know... the one with the bad aliasing...

If you think semantic games will set you away from the truth, you're wrong. Indigo won't be greater because of it.
I mean, if there's presently one freely renderer supporting GPU it wouldn't even be Indigo.

[neo0.]

Judging by what I have seen Lux renderer is not nearly as full featured as indigo..

EDIT : does indigo support chromatic aberration and vignetting? Camera glare? Is this the same thing as aperture diffraction?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vignetting
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Glare_(vision)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chromatic_aberration

[fused]

yes, yes, no

[benn]

lol neo you're awesome.

[neo0.]

lol neo you're awesome.

That's what happens when you post at 2 am...

[Godzilla]

That's why I stopped posting help threads in the wee hours of the morning