The Beam Radiance Estimate for Volumetric Photon Mapping

Feature requests, bug reports and related discussion
Post Reply
10 posts • Page 1 of 1
Oiram
Posts: 13
Joined: Sat Aug 04, 2007 11:15 am

The Beam Radiance Estimate for Volumetric Photon Mapping

Post by Oiram » Fri Apr 18, 2008 8:44 pm

A new method for efficiently simulating the scattering of light within participating media.

http://graphics.ucsd.edu/~wjarosz/publi ... 8beam.html

User avatar
SmartDen
Developer
Posts: 999
Joined: Fri Oct 13, 2006 10:58 pm
Location: Canary Islands
Contact:

Post by SmartDen » Fri Apr 18, 2008 8:53 pm

Wow! that whould be cool to have
Check normals, dude!

Image
Image

User avatar
fused
Developer
Posts: 3648
Joined: Fri Sep 22, 2006 7:19 am
Location: Berlin, Germany
3D Software: Cinema 4D

Post by fused » Fri Apr 18, 2008 10:12 pm

I think the word "estimate" in the title and description makes it a bit improbable, that we get that...

User avatar
lycium
Posts: 1216
Joined: Wed Sep 12, 2007 7:46 am
Location: Leipzig, Germany
Contact:

Post by lycium » Sat Apr 19, 2008 2:06 am

nice paper, it's cool to see how far jarosz has come since his early renderbitch days :) i'm looking forward to his siggy08 papers too.

@fused, there's nothing wrong with estimates, in an unbiased sense; all monte carlo methods are just estimators.

i really dislike photon mapping but its strength in efficient volumetric rendering is undeniable, which this paper extends...

Big Fan
Posts: 745
Joined: Tue Oct 17, 2006 9:37 am
Location: Nelson NZ

Post by Big Fan » Sat Apr 19, 2008 8:48 am

nice speed up too :wink:

User avatar
PureSpider
Posts: 1459
Joined: Tue Apr 08, 2008 9:37 am
Location: Karlsruhe, BW, Germany
Contact:

Post by PureSpider » Sat Apr 19, 2008 9:28 am

Would be great for SSS, if I'm right?

User avatar
lycium
Posts: 1216
Joined: Wed Sep 12, 2007 7:46 am
Location: Leipzig, Germany
Contact:

Post by lycium » Sat Apr 19, 2008 5:35 pm

yesindeed. however, indigo seems to be quite efficient with volumetrics (including sss) so it's probably not necessary. a nice thing about unbiased monte carlo methods is that they give the result that everything else wants to produce ;)

User avatar
Azazeo
Posts: 38
Joined: Sun Apr 13, 2008 1:58 am
Location: Belarus
Contact:

Post by Azazeo » Thu May 01, 2008 8:01 pm

SSS give nice result, but take a LOT of time...
Image
2 IES Sourses, mirror, lens, prysm...
Better have some special methods to do such things (at least global dusty-air parameters :roll: )

PS Sorry for my English :oops:

User avatar
lycium
Posts: 1216
Joined: Wed Sep 12, 2007 7:46 am
Location: Leipzig, Germany
Contact:

Post by lycium » Thu May 01, 2008 8:39 pm

fantastic render! any pc/time infos?

User avatar
Azazeo
Posts: 38
Joined: Sun Apr 13, 2008 1:58 am
Location: Belarus
Contact:

Post by Azazeo » Thu May 01, 2008 9:01 pm

notebook - Acer 5520G (Turion X2 TK-55 (1.8 GHz), 3GB RAM)
Time - about an 1 h (don't remember exactly)

Post Reply
10 posts • Page 1 of 1