The Fry render does have more detail to it.
Was a catmull clark AA setting used for that render?
Maxwell update with new atmosphere system announced!
..also, i'd take alook at the white balance parameter, setting it to C, or to a warmer one. From the comparison you've posted, Indigo's output seems..cold, whereas the fry image looks warm.
I must be sincere: if i didn't know the potential of indigo, between the two pictures i'd pick the fry one, just because of the warmness of the scene, that's obviously corrupted by the slight different sun parameters, as CTZn noticed.
So +1 about re-doing the render, even half size, adjusting the sun position and choosing a different white point.
Keep it on: interesting topic.
I must be sincere: if i didn't know the potential of indigo, between the two pictures i'd pick the fry one, just because of the warmness of the scene, that's obviously corrupted by the slight different sun parameters, as CTZn noticed.
So +1 about re-doing the render, even half size, adjusting the sun position and choosing a different white point.
Keep it on: interesting topic.
- kwistenbiebel
- Posts: 496
- Joined: Sat Jan 27, 2007 12:31 am
The shots aren't comparable in setup.
In my experience, I own a copy of Fry and use it regularly, Indigo's color tones is often more vibrant and has real good color bleeding.
If there wasn't the lack of multilight and sun/sky seperation in Indigo, I would use it for all the work.
The promised Maxwell sky looks pretty awesome though
In my experience, I own a copy of Fry and use it regularly, Indigo's color tones is often more vibrant and has real good color bleeding.
If there wasn't the lack of multilight and sun/sky seperation in Indigo, I would use it for all the work.
The promised Maxwell sky looks pretty awesome though

Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests