Indigo 0.9 test 6

joegiampaoli · Post by **joegiampaoli** » Sun Aug 19, 2007 8:38 pm

OnoSendai wrote:Wow... I didn't know Wine could do the wxWidgets version of Indigo and display the GUI!

Time to move on to linux Ono!

joegiampaoli · Post by **joegiampaoli** » Sun Aug 19, 2007 8:48 pm

Ahhhhhh! Lutojar

By any chance are you opening one of the sample scenes in indigo?
I sometimes get or at some point got this error with some included test scenes....

Try opening antialias_test.igs for a start and see what happens.....

NOTE: also don't make a desktop launch in linux through wine, better run it directly from a shell like:

nice -19 wine indigo.exe

Then open the file I pointed above from there....

Lutojar · Post by **Lutojar** » Sun Aug 19, 2007 8:52 pm

are you running indigo directly from it's folder, make sure there is a inifile.txt inside the indigo folder

I'm sure

I run Indigo from same folder that I use in Windowz (on win partition),
and when copy Indigo folder to Linux partition - have same result

(tearful crying)

joegiampaoli · Post by **joegiampaoli** » Sun Aug 19, 2007 8:54 pm

well......hmmmmm try downloading directly to linux from website unzip and do what I mention above..... You might get some missing dll errors, just google them up, and download them to your wine system 32 folder

Lutojar · Post by **Lutojar** » Sun Aug 19, 2007 9:20 pm

THANX A LOT!!!!!

its working!!

joegiampaoli · Post by **joegiampaoli** » Sun Aug 19, 2007 9:23 pm

No Prob...

zsouthboy · Post by **zsouthboy** » Mon Aug 20, 2007 6:16 am

@Lutojar:

more than likely your problem was a permissions error.

next time, simply open a terminal, and chown the indigo directory.

zuegs · Post by **zuegs** » Fri Aug 24, 2007 2:48 am

Hi Ono,
when i run "indigo_console" as network master, it still reports periodicaly "Display took xxxx s". I think in console mode there's no need for "Display" as there is no window to display

.... only moment tonemapping is used is for PNG or EXR output (only all 5mins in my case). BTW, is it possible to dissable PNG output too, that renderer only outputs IGI without any need for tonemapping??? That would be cooool and a minimum in cpu-power-wasting

SmartDen · Post by **SmartDen** » Fri Aug 24, 2007 2:54 am

zuegs wrote: skipped...
BTW, is it possible to dissable PNG output too, that renderer only outputs IGI without any need for tonemapping??? That would be cooool and a minimum in cpu-power-wasting

I could be very useful! I second the request!

CTZn · Post by **CTZn** » Fri Aug 24, 2007 4:07 am

In that case a prompt would be usefull, in the case where you are not saving any image (by mistake).

zsouthboy · Post by **zsouthboy** » Fri Aug 24, 2007 4:10 am

yeah if we could set display period to -1 or something, that'd be nice

Kram1032 · Post by **Kram1032** » Fri Aug 24, 2007 4:15 am

-1 == infinite == no GUI !?

Kosmokrator · Post by **Kosmokrator** » Fri Aug 24, 2007 7:39 am

just downloaded the x64 bit version of indigo and runs perfect on my system and windows vista ultimate x64!!!the machine is from fresh install!
thnx Nick!

mrCarnivore · Post by **mrCarnivore** » Fri Aug 24, 2007 6:59 pm

CTZn wrote:In that case a prompt would be usefull, in the case where you are not saving any image (by mistake).

Prompts are really awkward, when you want to do batch rendering (as can be the case with network rendering). So I would suggest only a warning message if there is absolutely no output defined and the image doesn't act as a slave.

BTW: Do rendering slaves need to save images or can they just send them through the network?

vansan · Post by **vansan** » Fri Aug 24, 2007 7:09 pm

I have an issue with Null material - the region behind the Null material clears much faster than the whole image.

I'll make some testrender today to show this.
Use MLT + BiDir + Hybrid.

Indigo 0.9 test 6

Who is online