question for the pros

IanC · Post by **IanC** » Fri Aug 10, 2007 4:10 am

The eye works in a very different way, there is a lot or processing done before the signals go through the optic nerve.

zsouthboy · Post by **zsouthboy** » Fri Aug 10, 2007 5:16 am

IanC wrote:The eye works in a very different way, there is a lot or processing done before the signals go through the optic nerve.

It's almost amazing that we can see anything at all - the human eye is a TERRIBLE camera.

It's just that the CPU we have, filtering the signal, is excellent.

Kram1032 · Post by **Kram1032** » Fri Aug 10, 2007 7:17 am

not really - it's not a CPU; It's MULTIBLE:
the whole seeing center (and all the others, too), is made of millions of CPUs - 1 Neuron = 1 core

The resolution of the eye isn't bad at all, and also the colour range and detail in colour is great. Not toooo good is the fps - it could be much higher. (But if it was, games where much laggier or much more expensive xD)

manitwo · Post by **manitwo** » Fri Aug 10, 2007 7:22 am

a cpu also isnt one piece of metall (combination from thousands of transistors and whatnot ...)

Kram1032 · Post by **Kram1032** » Fri Aug 10, 2007 7:23 am

but a tiny cell is the same as a tiny - but still much bigger - core

deltaepsylon · Post by **deltaepsylon** » Fri Aug 10, 2007 8:13 am

i dont think machines will match the human eye for some time, at least not in realtime graphics. cuz the eye dont have to worry about poly count or textures

question for the pros

Who is online