General questions about Indigo, the scene format, rendering etc...
-
dougal2

- Posts: 2532
- Joined: Wed Nov 15, 2006 8:17 am
- Location: South London
Post
by dougal2 » Fri Apr 18, 2008 3:58 am
also bear in mind that .igi files (same/similar data as indigo slaves transmit across the network) don't actually compress very well:
Code: Select all
17,285,040 im1188991340.igi
16,416,112 im1188991340.igi.bz2
16,047,131 im1188991340.igi.zip
16,047,002 im1188991340.igi.gz
-
Zom-B

- Posts: 4701
- Joined: Tue Jul 04, 2006 4:18 pm
- Location: ´'`\_(ò_Ó)_/´'`
-
Contact:
Post
by Zom-B » Fri Apr 18, 2008 5:04 am
Using 7z compression, you can pull it down to 76% of original File size...
polygonmanufaktur.de
-
zsouthboy
- Posts: 1395
- Joined: Fri Oct 13, 2006 5:12 am
Post
by zsouthboy » Fri Apr 18, 2008 5:21 am
For a network render, set your upload frame time to 10 minutes or more, to reduce network load. Your end result won't matter.
7z does a better job (not great, but better) at compressing igi files, btw.
EDIT: ZomB beat me to it.
-
dougal2

- Posts: 2532
- Joined: Wed Nov 15, 2006 8:17 am
- Location: South London
Post
by dougal2 » Fri Apr 18, 2008 5:23 am
nope.
15,800,239 im1188991340.7z
yeah ok, it's smaller than the others but it's still 91%.
-
alex22
- Posts: 171
- Joined: Thu Apr 12, 2007 12:07 pm
- Location: Germany
Post
by alex22 » Fri Apr 18, 2008 6:18 am
It would be nice to have a compression like png. For example you could just save the difference of a pixel to the pixel left of it. Then you compress everything with zip. Especially the exponents of the colors (they are float, aren't they?) shouldn't change that much over the picture.
-
dougal2

- Posts: 2532
- Joined: Wed Nov 15, 2006 8:17 am
- Location: South London
Post
by dougal2 » Fri Apr 18, 2008 6:20 am
alex22
don't change much? are you kidding? especially the first few frames to upload will be very noisy indeed and that's what kills the compression ratio.
-
Sukrim
- Posts: 66
- Joined: Wed Jan 09, 2008 6:47 am
Post
by Sukrim » Fri Apr 18, 2008 6:57 am
Does the Slave have to give updates that often or wouldn't a single update after let's say an hour or xxxxx spp or so be enough?
-
dougal2

- Posts: 2532
- Joined: Wed Nov 15, 2006 8:17 am
- Location: South London
Post
by dougal2 » Fri Apr 18, 2008 7:00 am
you can set frame_upload_period to whatever you like.
-
Sukrim
- Posts: 66
- Joined: Wed Jan 09, 2008 6:47 am
Post
by Sukrim » Fri Apr 18, 2008 7:11 am
Well then it wouldn't even have to upload at all?
As far as I understand it, all network rendering does is render the same picture as the master with a different seed and then send the file sometimes to the master that then tries to stitch the igi-files together, right?
Then it would also be possible to render a file until xxxxx spp, send the resulting picture back to a master and then recombine the image?
If yes, this would be ideal for a possible BOINC project, since you can already pack a scene into an archive and distribute + render that over the net... if you could then collect the results and recombine them to the final picture you "only" have to build up a BOINC project!

-
nikolatesla20
- Posts: 52
- Joined: Fri Mar 09, 2007 4:44 am
Post
by nikolatesla20 » Fri Apr 18, 2008 7:25 am
That may be true, but one of the reasons I like to have network rendering is also to increase the speed of the rendering so I can make adjustments more quickly. So I don't want to wait 1 hour between updates if I'm trying to tweak the scene to look like I want

Hence network rendering speeds up the tweaking a lot imho.
Although, at final render time, you could then set your upload rate to a slower value.
-niko
-
Sukrim
- Posts: 66
- Joined: Wed Jan 09, 2008 6:47 am
Post
by Sukrim » Fri Apr 18, 2008 7:42 am
Yeah, internet rendering would be only useful for final renders and animations, since they might take 1 or 2 days until the results are submitted back from the clients.
Network rendering for previews though is mostly just for small resolutions so compression doesn't matter that much I guess...
-
Zom-B

- Posts: 4701
- Joined: Tue Jul 04, 2006 4:18 pm
- Location: ´'`\_(ò_Ó)_/´'`
-
Contact:
Post
by Zom-B » Fri Apr 18, 2008 8:16 am
dougal2 wrote:nope.
15,800,239 im1188991340.7z
yeah ok, it's smaller than the others but it's still 91%.
I tested now on 3 different igi files from 14 to 102 MB, and I have to confirm my ~76%!
I have no idea if the content of an igi is related to compression size,
here are my 7zip settings using version 4.57 x64:
-
Attachments
-

- compressing a igi to ~76%
- settings.jpg (49.24 KiB) Viewed 3539 times
polygonmanufaktur.de
-
PureSpider
- Posts: 1459
- Joined: Tue Apr 08, 2008 9:37 am
- Location: Karlsruhe, BW, Germany
-
Contact:
Post
by PureSpider » Fri Apr 18, 2008 8:34 am
Stay on topic please

-
Sukrim
- Posts: 66
- Joined: Wed Jan 09, 2008 6:47 am
Post
by Sukrim » Fri Apr 18, 2008 9:04 am
This is ontopic, since the application maybe should include compression of the "update" pictures of Indigo slaves or not, depending on how good they can be compressed.
-
PureSpider
- Posts: 1459
- Joined: Tue Apr 08, 2008 9:37 am
- Location: Karlsruhe, BW, Germany
-
Contact:
Post
by PureSpider » Mon Apr 21, 2008 6:19 am
Any news on this?
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 22 guests