General questions about Indigo, the scene format, rendering etc...
-
Gwenouille
- Posts: 9
- Joined: Wed May 21, 2008 11:04 am
Post
by Gwenouille » Wed Jun 25, 2008 9:36 am
Hi guys !
I've tried to produce a material for the Database, and i thought that a concrete texture would be a good thing to do, especially because i could use displacement mapping...
So i turned to these pictures from BbB:
http://www.indigorenderer.com/joomla/fo ... php?t=2641 to create that material:

Is that alright to use BbBs textures ?
BbB are you ok with that ?
If you think this is not right, i'll erase the texture from my disc, I was just seing it as an exercise.
Otherwise, I'd be glad to upload it ...
What do you think ?
-
Zom-B

- Posts: 4701
- Joined: Tue Jul 04, 2006 4:18 pm
- Location: ´'`\_(ò_Ó)_/´'`
-
Contact:
Post
by Zom-B » Wed Jun 25, 2008 9:54 am
Only BbB can answer this, but your displacement maps seems to be messed up!
The idea of a Displacement Map is to displace the parts that are needed to, but you displaced the whole concrete, not only the details :/
polygonmanufaktur.de
-
BbB
- Posts: 1996
- Joined: Fri Feb 09, 2007 8:28 am
- Location: Berlin
-
Contact:
Post
by BbB » Wed Jun 25, 2008 10:22 am
Gwenouille
No problem at all man. They're here to be used and abused (and, yes, displaced too). Though, like my good friend Zomb, I wonder if this is the best material for displacement. Such a wall would be relatively flat. I think you're better off working with bump here and playing with the exponent channel (very important for good concrete).
-
Behrendt
- Posts: 255
- Joined: Wed Jun 28, 2006 8:30 pm
- Location: Cologne, Germany
-
Contact:
Post
by Behrendt » Wed Jun 25, 2008 11:10 am
Think so too, concrete walls aren't showing such big areas where displacement would be neccessary. But infact you're getting a slowdown due to subdivisions where they aren't neccessary. So I would stick to bumpmapping as proposed before.
-
Gwenouille
- Posts: 9
- Joined: Wed May 21, 2008 11:04 am
Post
by Gwenouille » Wed Jun 25, 2008 6:24 pm
Thanks for your (unanimous) advice !
I'll stick to bump-mapping then. it's been a nice try anyway: it was the first time i went into this xml files and tried to understand them.
BbB: thanks for this material !
I'll try to re-render it with a normal bump map today.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 34 guests