SomeQuestionsFromNewUSER

Kram1032 · Post by **Kram1032** » Mon Sep 10, 2007 4:32 am

SmartDen said that for hundreds of times -.-

Sky gain is an artefact, he'll remove it in next exporter, as it does, exactly, nothing

usually, you need pics of that size, to print.... but if you print, you need less supersamples, anyway, as the edges will look far smoother

vux · Post by **vux** » Mon Sep 10, 2007 10:51 pm

SmartDen said that for hundreds of times

what for hundreds times?

Big Fan · Post by **Big Fan** » Mon Sep 10, 2007 11:09 pm

where is this said officially? I cant find it anywhere..
I really wish ono would make proper statements about whats in and out and bring his examples up to date

Post by **OnoSendai** » Mon Sep 10, 2007 11:15 pm

Big Fan wrote:where is this said officially? I cant find it anywhere..
I really wish ono would make proper statements about whats in and out and bring his examples up to date

read the documentation.

Big Fan · Post by **Big Fan** » Mon Sep 10, 2007 11:30 pm

write you own exporters

EDIT ok I looked at the script and I can confirm that the sky gain box actually does nothing anyway...so I wouldnt worry about the fact that it is no longer used in Indigo...it just needs to be removed from the UI to stop people messing with it

EDIT 2 cache trees code is not functional -needs a boolean -my fault but no one noticed all this time

EDIT 3
ono in your 09 manual p5 there are some example render settings given and they include russian roulette and strats width which are gone for some time now I think

Kram1032 · Post by **Kram1032** » Tue Sep 11, 2007 1:26 am

@ vux

Kram1032 wrote:SmartDen said that for hundreds of times -.-
Code: Select all
--->--->--->--->
Sky gain is an artefact, he'll remove it in next exporter, as it does, exactly, nothing

vux · Post by **vux** » Tue Sep 11, 2007 11:34 pm

Ono I think You need to use ASSEMBLER for develop Indigo. It will be more fast....and unique unbiased engine

at least in the critical sections of code

Kram1032 · Post by **Kram1032** » Wed Sep 12, 2007 3:47 am

@ vux: If you've mastered assembler, do it yourself

- not too easy, to prog via assembler....

vux · Post by **vux** » Wed Sep 12, 2007 7:45 am

not too easy, to prog via assembler

I now. Bau also I now that it use minimum of ram and it more-more speedy...
sooner i programmed in assembler and saw it power
but I have bad mathematik and phisic...

So maybe Ono have assembler-friends to help him

oogsnoepje · Post by **oogsnoepje** » Wed Sep 12, 2007 5:18 pm

vux wrote:also I now that it use minimum of ram and it more-more speedy...

I can do assembly that's slower than C++!

In other words: C++ can be as good or even better than doing it straight in assembly. Think about all the ports you'd have to do for other platforms/architectures. Think about having to optimize the mathematical routines in a huge program that's written in assembly. Think about how much stress it would give and how much hair you would pull out.

I would be bald between now and next week if I'd give it a try!
Heck, I'm getting gray hairs by just thinking about it!

vux · Post by **vux** » Thu Sep 13, 2007 3:40 am

You are right about different platform. But I thnik that assemblers like FASM
is very ussefull for this Idea...
What about port for MenuetOS???

SomeQuestionsFromNewUSER

Who is online