0.7 Documentation (WIP)

Post by **OnoSendai** » Fri Feb 16, 2007 1:50 am

j_07 wrote: Also, what after-comma-precission is required/supported when exporting a scene?

No particular precision is required. The precision supported should be sufficient

j_07 · Post by **j_07** » Fri Feb 16, 2007 2:46 am

Thanks for your reply!

OnoSendai wrote:The uv_sets, when defining a texture element, choose which set of UV texture coordinates to use.
The uv_set value needs to match a uv_set exported from a mesh.

As far as I can see, the uv_set value refers to the expose_uv_set element which, besides the name element, only features one tweakable value called "index". How does it work? Is this a rotational integer defining the lists first uv-coordinate?

j_07 · Post by **j_07** » Sun Feb 18, 2007 4:47 am

Another thing: How does sensor_width and lens_sensor_dist exactly relate to the field-of-view? I need to know, how to generate an exact FOV of 45 or 90 or any other precise angle.

Kram1032 · Post by **Kram1032** » Sun Feb 18, 2007 7:04 am

And Panoramic 360° would be nice, too^^

Deus · Post by **Deus** » Sun Feb 18, 2007 3:06 pm

OnoSendai wrote:
j_07 wrote: Also, what after-comma-precission is required/supported when exporting a scene?
No particular precision is required. The precision supported should be sufficient

Its not entirely true Ono. If you have a rotation matrix and dont have enough decimals it can complain that its not orthagonal.

j_07 · Post by **j_07** » Mon Feb 19, 2007 2:41 am

Just a tiny correction concerning the Aperture Radius: Larger radius actually means less depth of field, right?

Autofokus is a great idea, btw!

Kram1032 · Post by **Kram1032** » Mon Feb 19, 2007 2:59 am

No, it means more DoF

You wouldn't need a lens in your eye, if it would mean less DoF:
The more light trespasses the pupil, (Our natural Aperture), the blurrier, our sight gets. -> Our Sight in the night is blurrier than in day time...
The lens helps us correct the blurriness of our sight -> it bundles the light to get it sharper.

kepler · Post by **kepler** » Mon Feb 19, 2007 3:16 am

Kram1032 wrote:No, it means more DoF

What means for you depht of field? For me is "the distance in front of and beyond the subject that appears to be in focus" (from a Wikipedia page). So larger aperture radius means less depth of field.

Kram1032 · Post by **Kram1032** » Mon Feb 19, 2007 3:27 am

Hmmm...
With this definition, it would mean more DoF...
But most ones at leat think, it's the reversed, so if there stands more DoF, it may confuses more people than helps them, although, it's correct...

0.7 Documentation (WIP)

Who is online