IQ [1100% non indigo]

deltaepsylon · Post by **deltaepsylon** » Tue Aug 21, 2007 6:55 am

heh, the pythy theorem was dumb. i didnt even solve it, just estimated. and i got it right =)

Behrendt · Post by **Behrendt** » Tue Aug 21, 2007 6:56 am

I got 131. But this is not a result of this online-test. It's proofed by specialist so I could move into a higher grade. But I'm still fighting against the typical high-intelligence-image. I also like beer,breasts and football

alex22 · Post by **alex22** » Tue Aug 21, 2007 6:58 am

@Kram1032
Ah now I know. I used pythagoreon to, but I did a mistake in calculation.

Kram1032 · Post by **Kram1032** » Tue Aug 21, 2007 7:04 am

@Behrendt: why do you think, that's fighting against the

typical high-intelligence-image.

?
It simply NOT fighting against normality^^

I don't fight against normality, either, although my normality is different:

I don't like alcohol or sports... (although the second one is changing in a way... dunno...)

@alex22:
what did you do, then?

alex22 · Post by **alex22** » Tue Aug 21, 2007 8:03 am

I added the lengths first, so I got 1 big pythagorian rectangles instead of to smaller ones (although not as good to calculate) and set 16*16 =196 instead of 256

Kram1032 · Post by **Kram1032** » Tue Aug 21, 2007 8:07 am

lol I see^^

196=14²
169=13²

a dual system number, squared, never can be a NON dual system number^^

1
2
4
8
16
32
64
128
256
512
1024
...

alex22 · Post by **alex22** » Tue Aug 21, 2007 8:24 am

I know, but I didn't think of it.

deltaepsylon · Post by **deltaepsylon** » Tue Aug 21, 2007 9:03 am

took the test again, without* being under the influence of too much cofee, and got a 135
freeky thing is, my friend took it at the same time and got the same thing 0_0

Kram1032 · Post by **Kram1032** » Tue Aug 21, 2007 9:05 am

not very freaky...
I think, that test has far too few questions...

It's quite easy, to get same values...

looks like if we're around 130-140, at this forum.
Next generation (omg, I'm 17 and I'm talking about next generation lol) will have ~150-160 O.o incredible increase.

deltaepsylon · Post by **deltaepsylon** » Tue Aug 21, 2007 9:09 am

uh, i have a friend with 200 as well.
He's pretty damn smart.

still wondering what ono's iq is... im betting 140

Frances · Post by **Frances** » Tue Aug 21, 2007 9:36 am

deltaepsylon wrote:uh, i have a friend with 200 as well.
He's pretty damn smart.

still wondering what ono's iq is... im betting 140

It can't be because his has got to be higher than mine.

deltaepsylon · Post by **deltaepsylon** » Tue Aug 21, 2007 10:38 am

whats yours?

edit: duh nvm

Frances · Post by **Frances** » Tue Aug 21, 2007 12:21 pm

deltaepsylon wrote:

whats yours?

edit: duh nvm

CTZn · Post by **CTZn** » Tue Aug 21, 2007 6:35 pm

Kram1032 wrote:That's easy:
The test says "they start from the SAME POINT" (which isn't possible, obviously, but the only way, to solve it)
You have to think about the scene: those curves are 90° angles.
so, you have to use the pytagoras:

8²+6²=64+36=100
100^0,5 = 10

so, they both changed their original position by 10 Km.

as they BOTH moved, you have to double that.

10*2=20

conclusion: the cars are 20 Km away from each other.

That's typically the kind of exercise I zapped when doing such test (for true, with real ppl). At that time they told me I was in the higher 10% (~140), now I don't want to do such test again coz well I'm... undertrained... you know, computers...

Kram1032 · Post by **Kram1032** » Wed Aug 22, 2007 3:25 am

actually, that question wasn't that dump, delta

Frances' post told us, the IQ >= 140... how high is it, actually?

lol CTZn

IQ [1100% non indigo]

Who is online