Feature requests, bug reports and related discussion
-
CTZn
- Posts: 7240
- Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 4:34 pm
- Location: Paris, France
Post
by CTZn » Fri Aug 10, 2007 1:16 am
If you want to compute a single image for a long time its ok like that, but in some cases you want
the image to be calculated up to the halt point, not only
the log, got me ?
Indigo can save the image when it is manually exited (IIRC... or not ?) but not when an halt limit is reached, it's a non-sense. I already did a similar request but definitly at a certain point you want the image cooked not Indigo killed
Thx Ono !
obsolete asset
-
zsouthboy
- Posts: 1395
- Joined: Fri Oct 13, 2006 5:12 am
Post
by zsouthboy » Fri Aug 10, 2007 2:31 am
It does seem silly to save (and tonemap) the image every n seconds with a halt time.
-
deltaepsylon
- Posts: 417
- Joined: Tue Jan 09, 2007 11:50 pm
Post
by deltaepsylon » Fri Aug 10, 2007 3:31 am
well sometimes there are crashes and whatnot, specially if you are using a test build (e.g. .9t4 )
I think the image and tonemap should be saved, like, every time a quarter of the halt samples have been reached(e.g when you ask for 100 mut/pixels, then every 25 it gets saved)
just my $0.02
-
Headroom

- Posts: 1060
- Joined: Wed Aug 08, 2007 1:07 pm
- Location: Spartanburg, SC, USA
-
Contact:
Post
by Headroom » Fri Aug 10, 2007 3:33 am
I agree with CTZn.
If lightning kills your UPS after numerous hours of rendertime, you are back to square one.
-
deltaepsylon
- Posts: 417
- Joined: Tue Jan 09, 2007 11:50 pm
Post
by deltaepsylon » Fri Aug 10, 2007 3:36 am
wait, what?
you are kinda agreeing with me but with ctzn, thats kinda contradictory...?

-
zsouthboy
- Posts: 1395
- Joined: Fri Oct 13, 2006 5:12 am
Post
by zsouthboy » Fri Aug 10, 2007 5:09 am
Headroom wrote:I agree with CTZn.
If lightning kills your UPS after numerous hours of rendertime, you are back to square one.
Can we agree that this is a problem with... ALL tasks that take a non-trivial amount of time?
-
OnoSendai

- Posts: 6243
- Joined: Sat May 20, 2006 6:16 pm
- Location: Wellington, NZ
-
Contact:
Post
by OnoSendai » Fri Aug 10, 2007 4:26 pm
Yes, this is very reasonable, will add to TODO list.
-
SmartDen

- Posts: 999
- Joined: Fri Oct 13, 2006 10:58 pm
- Location: Canary Islands
-
Contact:
Post
by SmartDen » Tue Aug 14, 2007 3:06 am
I second that. The buffer must be saved by reaching halt time or halt samples per pixel.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest