Feature requests, bug reports and related discussion
-
Caronte
- Posts: 61
- Joined: Tue May 01, 2007 7:17 am
- Location: Valencia, Spain
Post
by Caronte » Tue Jun 26, 2007 6:20 am
This new technique use standar LDRI images to get a kind of HDRI illumination.

It's very cool, because a huge amount of environment maps are simply jpg
http://www.banterle.com/Francesco/itmo.html
Would be nice if Indigo could use a panorama JPG (from photos) to illuminate the scene

Sorry about my poor english

-
Kram1032
- Posts: 6649
- Joined: Tue Jan 23, 2007 3:55 am
- Location: Austria near Vienna
Post
by Kram1032 » Tue Jun 26, 2007 9:02 pm
-> also an idea to get kinda-HDR-textured Emitters

I already wondered,why such a thing doesn't exist.
-
mrCarnivore
- Posts: 517
- Joined: Sun Mar 04, 2007 6:20 am
- Location: Stuttgart, Germany
Post
by mrCarnivore » Tue Jun 26, 2007 11:12 pm
You could also convert the ldr into hdr using hdrshop or photoshop and then simply use it in indigo....
-
Kram1032
- Posts: 6649
- Joined: Tue Jan 23, 2007 3:55 am
- Location: Austria near Vienna
Post
by Kram1032 » Wed Jun 27, 2007 1:15 am
yes, that's what I meant. but theefore, you first need to convert your jpg to ldr
-
StompinTom

- Posts: 1828
- Joined: Mon Sep 04, 2006 3:33 pm
Post
by StompinTom » Wed Jun 27, 2007 1:46 am
Kram1032 wrote:yes, that's what I meant. but theefore, you first need to convert your jpg to ldr
ldr=low dynamic range
which is basically any 8 bit image (jpg, png, bmp, etc etc) because you cant have much of a dynamic range within 8 bits.
hdr=high dynamic range=way more bits per pixels(=bigger file size)
that conversion technique is cool, but as you see in one of the test images, any smooth transition is lost and instead you end up with a bunch of hard shadows. its easier to get rid of unneeded data than to try to interpolate data from nothing.
-
Kram1032
- Posts: 6649
- Joined: Tue Jan 23, 2007 3:55 am
- Location: Austria near Vienna
Post
by Kram1032 » Wed Jun 27, 2007 2:53 am
oh, ok... hum... But this converts ldr to more accurate (not entirely accurate) hdr.
it bleaches out bright spots, makes dark spots brighter and reverse.
In the three pics, you can see, that the only problem is, that the shadow is too hard, but else, it's just great.
You can't do that with simply renaming (more or less) a jpg to exr...
-
StompinTom

- Posts: 1828
- Joined: Mon Sep 04, 2006 3:33 pm
Post
by StompinTom » Wed Jun 27, 2007 5:29 am
true, cuz AFAIK all it does is 'stretches' the 8 bits into something higher like 32, thereby creating those stepped transitions. its like taking a really dark image into photoshop and clipping its levels real low.
-
Zom-B

- Posts: 4701
- Joined: Tue Jul 04, 2006 4:18 pm
- Location: ´'`\_(ò_Ó)_/´'`
-
Contact:
Post
by Zom-B » Thu Jun 28, 2007 8:45 am
Hereanother interesting Paper.
polygonmanufaktur.de
-
banty
- Posts: 1
- Joined: Thu Jun 28, 2007 7:57 am
Post
by banty » Thu Jun 28, 2007 10:49 am
Hello everybody!
I'm the first authour of the first paper.
true, cuz AFAIK all it does is 'stretches' the 8 bits into something higher like 32, thereby creating those stepped transitions. its like taking a really dark image into photoshop and clipping its levels real low.
It's true the inverse tone mapping is a kind of strechting, however the interpolation using the exand map is meant to avoid big step transitions. Using a larger radius (25%) in the density map for creating the expand map you can attenuate hard shadows, it's not 100% perfect as in using an HDRI but it's quite near. I've just updated my website with new results if you want to check it out:
http://www.banterle.com/francesco/itmo.html
-
Kram1032
- Posts: 6649
- Joined: Tue Jan 23, 2007 3:55 am
- Location: Austria near Vienna
Post
by Kram1032 » Wed Jul 18, 2007 11:11 pm
@banty:
do you think, it would be possible, to use an adaptive radius, to get even better results?
(No idea, how to, but maybe, the brighter, the wider, or something, like that...)
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests