Feature requests, bug reports and related discussion
-
manitwo
- Posts: 1029
- Joined: Wed Jul 05, 2006 4:50 am
- Location: Tirol - Austria
Post
by manitwo » Wed Aug 15, 2007 2:30 am
Kram1032 wrote:it should be, I'd say, but minimum should be, about, 500, or so

(still bad for caustics, but surely better than 10)
no. i hate such limitations. either leave that optoin or remove it but that "middle" way would be horrible.
i'd say leave that option to the people who know what this numbers will do - experienced users will know where the inifile is located.

-
Giojazz
- Posts: 9
- Joined: Wed Aug 08, 2007 4:18 pm
Post
by Giojazz » Wed Aug 15, 2007 6:32 am
Ho ripetuto i rendering impostando "max_num_consec_rejections" a 500, ma ho notato che la qualità delle
immagini e peggiorata, come possiamo notare le riflessioni sulle sfere è riprodotta in modo sommario
solo accennata, invece nella versione senza il bidirezionale appaiono corrette e vengono calcolate sin da
subito appena inizia il calcolo, con il bidirezionale le riflessioni incominciono ad apparire solo dopo molti
minuti e vengono rese molto approssimate a fatica, io non sono un programmatore ma immagino e come
se l' accellerazione introdotta con "exit_portal" non avvenisse correttamente nei confronti della luce diretta del
sole sulle superfici trasparenti o riflettenti.
Io domando..nei rendering di interni con "exit_portal", le riflessioni nel bidirezionale non dovrebbero essere calcolate con la stessa velocita e immediatezza come avviene nel calcolo non bidirezionale?
------------------------------------------------
I have repeated the rendering setting up “max_num_consec_rejections” to 500, but I have noticed that the quality of
images and gotten worse, as we can notice the reflections on the spheres is reproduced in highly summarized way
only pointed out, instead in the version without the bidirectional one they appear corrected and they come calculated sin give
endured as soon as it begins the calculation, with bidirectional the reflections incominciono to only appear after many
minuteren and come yields many approximating to hard work, I am not a programmatore but I imagine and like
if the accellerazione introduced with “exit_portal” correctly did not happen nei comparisons of the direct light of
sun on superficial transparent or the reflecting.
I ask. .in the rendering of inner with “exit_portal”, the reflections in the bidirectional one would not have to be calculated with the same one velocita and immediacy like happens in the not bidirectional calculation?
-
Attachments
-

- Immagine 3+.jpg (438.22 KiB) Viewed 736 times
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Ahrefs [Bot] and 1 guest