Fireplaces

Show off your final renders
Post Reply
8 posts • Page 1 of 1
User avatar
boweeb007
Posts: 83
Joined: Sat Jul 08, 2006 5:00 am
Location: Columbus, OH (USA)

Fireplaces

Post by boweeb007 » Fri Aug 11, 2006 12:04 am

Not nearly impressive as others in this forum - no caustics or fancy bump-maps, but here's my first real application of indigo. I work for a company, called Lang Stone, in the drafting department and my boss asked me to draw some of the fireplaces that we've made in 3d. Long story short, he was impressed with what I turned in (and even got a raise partly due to this). They're relatively simple scenes, but I just started using Blender in january and Indigo in march. The closest thing I knew about modelling before then is drawing in 3d in AutoCAD.

For a good background on what I went through, check out this forum I started at BlenderArtists:

http://blenderartists.org/forum/showthread.php?t=63919

Here's three of the fireplaces:
(the material looks different because we used different limestones)

Image
Image
Image[/img]

User avatar
OnoSendai
Developer
Posts: 6244
Joined: Sat May 20, 2006 6:16 pm
Location: Wellington, NZ
Contact:

Post by OnoSendai » Fri Aug 11, 2006 12:52 am

cool.. very nice and clean renders.

User avatar
Kosmokrator
Posts: 1141
Joined: Sat Jul 29, 2006 11:52 am
Location: Greece-Athens

Post by Kosmokrator » Fri Aug 11, 2006 2:31 am

how big is this fireplaces?u have a scale problem here i think...btw nice modeling...
1)Core i7 965XE stock CLOCK ,PSU:CHIEFTEC 850W
M/B ASUS P6T DELUXE,WATERCOOLING ZALMAN RESERATOR 2
MEMORY:6GB CORRSAIR @1600,Ati HD 4870x2,
MONITOR:LG 1950SQ,CASE:THERMALTAKE SOPRANO

User avatar
mzungu
Posts: 96
Joined: Wed Jul 12, 2006 3:21 am
Location: Arkansas, USA
Contact:

Post by mzungu » Fri Aug 11, 2006 3:35 am

Very nice work there, boweeb007! Its nice to see another user from the CAD world (old ACADer myself) "born-again" into blender/indigo!

Some C&C on the pix: I find the size of the gaps between the stone components a little distracting. Is there intended to be grout there, or are they typically mated face-to-face? (EDIT: reading thru your blenderartists thread, I see there's meant to be grout... (?) shouldn't you model this in, as well?)

Also, a nice "refinement" would be to put very slight chamfers (or rounds if you're feeling ambitious - not really necessary, tho) on all the edges of the various parts (like <.01"). This will allow light to reflect off them slightly, adding realism.

It would likely be easier to do this in AutoCAD (assuming you modeled them in 3D there...) than in blender, but its possible to do in blender as well (just a little messier...)

Great work! Add some ritzy wallpaper and a portrait of Abe Lincoln, and you're all set! :)
-mzungu
"The fear of the Lord is the beginning of wisdom" - Solomon

User avatar
boweeb007
Posts: 83
Joined: Sat Jul 08, 2006 5:00 am
Location: Columbus, OH (USA)

Post by boweeb007 » Fri Aug 11, 2006 7:32 am

@Ono-Sendai: Thanks

@Kosmokrater: You're right. comaparing these images side by side, you're left with no point of reference. That's partly because the ceiling isn't visible in any of the images. Part of what I was trying to do was showcase the product.

@mzungu: The gaps bug me, too. Someday I'll fill them in (I'm kind of busy right now), but in the mean time, like I said on BA, I was looking for a quick fix (which I don't think exists). Now that I have more exp under my belt, I'm a little more confident about improving the models. The bevel function in blender doesn't work too, bad. The only downside is that you can't select specific edges to bevel (although I read somewhere that that feature should be implimented soon). Also, you're right - I did model these originally in Acad. I had all the original production drawings, so it was just a process of extruding profiles and subtracting shapes from shapes (boolean). I had a lot of trouble getting from Acad to Blender. I narrowed the problem down to Acad's pitiful 3ds export. The best way I found, was to use 3ds to open the dwg and export as 3ds - the mesh resolution on curves was much better. (I had a 30-day 3ds demo).

User avatar
mzungu
Posts: 96
Joined: Wed Jul 12, 2006 3:21 am
Location: Arkansas, USA
Contact:

Post by mzungu » Fri Aug 11, 2006 7:59 am

boweeb007 wrote: ...The gaps bug me, too. Someday I'll fill them in (I'm kind of busy right now), but in the mean time, like I said on BA, I was looking for a quick fix (which I don't think exists).

Just some simple filler rectangles with a slightly different texture should suffice, I'd think...
boweeb007 wrote:Now that I have more exp under my belt, I'm a little more confident about improving the models. The bevel function in blender doesn't work too, bad. The only downside is that you can't select specific edges to bevel (although I read somewhere that that feature should be implimented soon).

Actually look in the scripts window under the mesh tools for a "Bevel Center" script which allows you to bevel only selected edges. Very cludgy script, tho and too often screws up your mesh (suggest making a backup mesh prior to testing.)
boweeb007 wrote:Also, you're right - I did model these originally in Acad. I had all the original production drawings, so it was just a process of extruding profiles and subtracting shapes from shapes (boolean).
Heh, heh... ah, the memories... Acad's 3D tools are actually a pretty good place to learn "dumb" solid modelling (ie. non-parametric). Started usin' 'em back in R13. However, if you can talk your boss into a midrange CAD package (like SolidWorks or Inventor) you could potentially shave 30-50% off your design/documentation time. Night & Day, believe me! :D
boweeb007 wrote: I had a lot of trouble getting from Acad to Blender. I narrowed the problem down to Acad's pitiful 3ds export. The best way I found, was to use 3ds to open the dwg and export as 3ds - the mesh resolution on curves was much better. (I had a 30-day 3ds demo).
You might take a peek at the FACETRES variable and crank it up to 10 before the 3DSOUT. This will boost your mesh densities nicely.
-mzungu
"The fear of the Lord is the beginning of wisdom" - Solomon

User avatar
boweeb007
Posts: 83
Joined: Sat Jul 08, 2006 5:00 am
Location: Columbus, OH (USA)

Post by boweeb007 » Fri Aug 11, 2006 11:28 pm

Just some simple filler rectangles with a slightly different texture should suffice, I'd think...
That would work. And just subdivide the face and "proportional edit" the vertices inwards to get the rounded channel.
Actually look in the scripts window under the mesh tools for a "Bevel Center" script which allows you to bevel only selected edges. Very cludgy script, tho and too often screws up your mesh (suggest making a backup mesh prior to testing.)
Just tested it. Very clunky but should come in handy here and there.
Heh, heh... ah, the memories... Acad's 3D tools are actually a pretty good place to learn "dumb" solid modelling (ie. non-parametric). Started usin' 'em back in R13. However, if you can talk your boss into a midrange CAD package (like SolidWorks or Inventor) you could potentially shave 30-50% off your design/documentation time. Night & Day, believe me!
I don't really do this kind of work often enough (officially) to justify buying a new product. That's what first got me into Blender. Then I became hooked. I have seen Solidworks though, and it seemed pretty powerful.
You might take a peek at the FACETRES variable and crank it up to 10 before the 3DSOUT. This will boost your mesh densities nicely.
That is EXACTLY what I've been looking for! Thanks, man!

User avatar
manitwo
Posts: 1029
Joined: Wed Jul 05, 2006 4:50 am
Location: Tirol - Austria

Post by manitwo » Sat Aug 12, 2006 11:32 am

:shock: f**k! sooo clean
if i didn't know that this i a indigo render i would say it is a vray or something.
btw - weird material of the fireplaces - are they reflective?

Post Reply
8 posts • Page 1 of 1

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 118 guests