Get feedback from others on your works in progress
-
burnin
- Posts: 153
- Joined: Tue May 04, 2010 2:53 pm
Post
by burnin » Wed Feb 03, 2016 7:36 am
Nice work.
Can look at latest images (couple of days ago) from Earth Polychromatic Imaging Camera:
http://epic.gsfc.nasa.gov/
To me it's simple: water IOR + roughness caused by waves (which is never constant, so much noise) ... so as long as it feels 'real'
Like in this 'closer' image:

-
Onizuka
- Posts: 111
- Joined: Thu Jun 19, 2014 3:48 am
- Location: Earth
Post
by Onizuka » Wed Feb 03, 2016 8:06 am
Thanks Burnin
water IOR + roughness caused by waves
I totally agree with you about that, I will see if lower the IOR is enough, or if I'll add some roughness, I'm on other details, so maybe a render tomorrow
-
CTZn
- Posts: 7240
- Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 4:34 pm
- Location: Paris, France
Post
by CTZn » Mon Feb 22, 2016 3:29 am
Pibuz wrote:Yes, from grazing angles I suppose.
In "frontal" view does it work the same way?
..I'm not saying your image is wrong: only...there's something strange going on with it

It's also reflected frontally: you can see the sun reflection in the middle of each band in this satellite view:
https://worldview.earthdata.nasa.gov/?p ... 6455940633
for tweaking match the highlight width, not its length obviously.
e: thinking that an eventual diffraction might be considered for correction, but it's probably negligeable
obsolete asset
-
Onizuka
- Posts: 111
- Joined: Thu Jun 19, 2014 3:48 am
- Location: Earth
Post
by Onizuka » Mon Feb 22, 2016 3:53 am
Yes I believe ( not because I am convinced of it but because of real pictures and physics ) that we shyould see some reflections even on a frontal view, more or less depending on the weather in the area and such various parameters.
This a render I made with a lower IOR. But I think the texture map should need some modifications on the oceans.
CTZn Tu parles du parametre "aperture diffraction" ou bien d'autre chose ?
Are you talking about the "aperture diffraction" parameter or something else ?
-
Attachments
-

- With a smaller IOR
-

- And a little rendering of Mars
-
CTZn
- Posts: 7240
- Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 4:34 pm
- Location: Paris, France
Post
by CTZn » Sat Feb 27, 2016 11:01 pm
Je parlais de l'amplification du reflet du soleil dans l'eau par l'optique du satellite, mais ignore cette remarque.
I was referring to the amplification of the sun's reflection by the sat optics in the photo, but you should dismiss that remark.
obsolete asset
-
Onizuka
- Posts: 111
- Joined: Thu Jun 19, 2014 3:48 am
- Location: Earth
Post
by Onizuka » Mon Feb 29, 2016 6:50 am
Burnin, I didn't use normal maps for these renders
-
Oscar J

- Posts: 2204
- Joined: Sat Mar 31, 2012 3:47 am
- Location: Gothenburg, Sweden
- 3D Software: Blender
Post
by Oscar J » Mon Feb 29, 2016 6:53 am
Mars is awesome!
-
Onizuka
- Posts: 111
- Joined: Thu Jun 19, 2014 3:48 am
- Location: Earth
Post
by Onizuka » Mon Feb 29, 2016 7:50 am
Thank you Oscar
I am more satisfied with Mars also
-
Onizuka
- Posts: 111
- Joined: Thu Jun 19, 2014 3:48 am
- Location: Earth
Post
by Onizuka » Sun Sep 04, 2016 11:45 pm
Io's shadow on beautifull Jupiter
-
Attachments
-

Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 56 guests