Latest Build

[zsouthboy]

It wouldn't be too hard to write an import filter for Photoshop to open .igi files directly, if that's your idea.

[dougal2]

It wouldn't be too hard to write an import filter for Photoshop to open .igi files directly, if that's your idea.

i just thought this - what about writing a reinhard tonemapping plugin too?

[joegiampaoli]

I have noticed that plugins like photoshop or gimp are more kind of a simulated bloom effect, while in indigo it kind of calculates a real camera lens.... I know it takes a hell of a time to process but I surely like more the bloom and glare in indigo, they are more realistic.

The bloom in Indigo is just a simple Gaussian blur, however it operates on HDR floating point pixel values, so in that sense it's more accurate, but also slower.
It could be sped up quite a lot though, in particular for supersampled images - it's not really necessary to treat each superpixel separately for the purposes of computing the bloom

AH, I see....ok.

[CTZn]

Er, Dougal... dunno if I missed something but I'm not experiencing the expected behaviour with VioletR12P1b1.exe !

The interface displays fine, image does load and shows up ok, but every parameter has no effect. Wether I activate and tweak any effect, nothing changes and the output line shows "Done." all the time, same for the log output wich stays unchanged as soon as the image is loaded, whatever I try.

Another weird thing is that it doesn't crash when exiting, but surprisingly it pops the firewall up (first launch) when quiting and not when launched, as expected.

Edit: In fact updating is triggered when I call a loading menu (especially Merge), so let's say it's fine thanks Dougal !

[dougal2]

Er, Dougal... dunno if I missed something but I'm not experiencing the expected behaviour with VioletR12P1b1.exe !

The interface displays fine, image does load and shows up ok, but every parameter has no effect. Wether I activate and tweak any effect, nothing changes and the output line shows "Done." all the time, same for the log output wich stays unchanged as soon as the image is loaded, whatever I try.

Another weird thing is that it doesn't crash when exiting, but surprisingly it pops the firewall up (first launch) when quiting and not when launched, as expected.

Edit: In fact updating is triggered when I call a loading menu (especially Merge), so let's say it's fine thanks Dougal !

you will either need to press the "update" button, or check the "auto" box.
Also, entering numbers manually into the boxes doesn't yet work, you need to drag the sliders.

[Lord of the Rings Junkie]

It would be nice if instead of having to reload an .igi file, the file would automatically update every time Indigo saved a new version.

[CTZn]

you will either need to press the "update" button, or check the "auto" box.

Muh, I missed both

[Sebastian]

Sry, but where can I download the latest build ??

[dougal2]

if you want the latest official release, it's the first post in this thread.


the latest beta hack by myself, based on release 12 (called R12P1B1) is on the third page of this thread.

[CTZn]

What about a progress bar in the status line (the one wich states "Updating...") ?

If I change camera glare settings, is blooming recomputed ? Is this necessary ?

[sk2k]

Hi,

R12P1B1 crashes at startup.

MfG
sk2k

Using Vista Home Premium 32bit.

[dougal2]

What about a progress bar in the status line (the one wich states "Updating...") ?

If I change camera glare settings, is blooming recomputed ? Is this necessary ?

a progress bar would require a callback from the image processing thread - not impossible. I'll have a fiddle in a minute and see what I can do.

And yes, if you change one parameter, all others need to be recomputed too. Each filter is applied to the image in sequence - there's no way around this.

[CTZn]

All right !

[Anthony]

And yes, if you change one parameter, all others need to be recomputed too. Each filter is applied to the image in sequence - there's no way around this.

Couldn't you make it so that when you change/turn on camera glare or bloom it creates an individual image with an alpha that it slaps onto the front of the original picture? I guess you would have to change heaps of stuffs but that would be possible wouldn't it?

[Anthony]

Hello?