Indigo 1.0.4

Kram1032 · Post by **Kram1032** » Wed Nov 28, 2007 9:10 am

YAY! Finally a direct way

One question: is this limited to the camera, or will you also get wave patterns with the double-slit-set-up?

Pinko5 · Post by **Pinko5** » Wed Nov 28, 2007 9:28 am

Tnx Ono!!!
Luca.

joegiampaoli · Post by **joegiampaoli** » Wed Nov 28, 2007 10:27 am

Thank you Ono

Big Fan · Post by **Big Fan** » Wed Nov 28, 2007 6:16 pm

more buttons.. more buttons.. too many buttons...

is the previous glare superseded by this?

Post by **OnoSendai** » Wed Nov 28, 2007 6:32 pm

Hi Big Fan,
yes, the previous glare stuff (and bloom) is obsolete.
The code is still in there, but I'll drop it at some point.

Big Fan · Post by **Big Fan** » Wed Nov 28, 2007 6:38 pm

ok thanks I'll make some space by chopping those then and rearranging a bit

hmmm blade offset should be linked to f stop shouldnt it?
I mean you wouldnt set that independantly would you?
if you have set an aperture radius say of 1mm = f16 that defines it already...?

rgigante · Post by **rgigante** » Wed Nov 28, 2007 9:33 pm

Once again, thank you Nick.

Riccardo.

Zom-B · Post by **Zom-B** » Wed Nov 28, 2007 10:21 pm

Thank you very much Ono!

Does anybody else tried to set "aperture_diffraction" to false?!
For me Indigo always crashes after warm up O_o (Windows Vista 64Bit)

Big Fan wrote:hmmm blade offset should be linked to f stop shouldnt it?
I mean you wouldnt set that independantly would you?
if you have set an aperture radius say of 1mm = f16 that defines it already...?

An f/64 results in much bigger glare than f/1...

filippo · Post by **filippo** » Wed Nov 28, 2007 11:00 pm

wonderfull job.......
filippo

dougal2 · Post by **dougal2** » Thu Nov 29, 2007 1:53 am

ZomB wrote: Does anybody else tried to set "aperture_diffraction" to false?!
For me Indigo always crashes after warm up O_o (Windows Vista 64Bit)

works fine here.

can I also ask how blade_offset and aperture_radius work together?

what about the size of white area in a aperture_shape::image vs. aperture_radius?

are you performing any white detection and/or image scaling?

I've noticed (and actually, expected) that when using aperture_shape::image the render is a bit out of focus. can the focus be compensated for?

Kram1032 · Post by **Kram1032** » Thu Nov 29, 2007 4:20 am

That's a good point, indeed. they should be 1:1, so, it should be given by the f-stop... (maybe not fully... it could be the "maximum" radius, which means, from the pivot to one of the corners...)

Post by **OnoSendai** » Thu Nov 29, 2007 6:19 am

I've added a note (Search for 'EDIT' in original post) on how to design your aperture maps, and noted that aperture_radius still works.

dougal2 · Post by **dougal2** » Thu Nov 29, 2007 6:35 am

Ok, thanks for the clarification

tobak30 · Post by **tobak30** » Thu Nov 29, 2007 7:41 am

any linux 64 bit version?

CTZn · Post by **CTZn** » Thu Nov 29, 2007 9:57 am

Thank you Ono (and Dougal2), I especially apreciate the effort put into explanations. A documented feature is a feature I will use, alas the contrary is also true, objectively.

I think Indigo is ready for the two slits experimentation, and I'm confident on the conclusion, provided that interferences are visible in first post attachments.

Cheers !

Indigo 1.0.4

Who is online