Indigo 1.1.17

tony · Post by **tony** » Mon Mar 02, 2009 9:30 am

Thanks for the linux version.

I'm trying the 64-bit.

Testescene am doing and can not discover the difference between a) bump_displacement_test.igs and b ) bumpmap_test.igs as meaning:

a) is moving out
b) moves inside (negative)

I thought that for the white parts of the map to come out towards the outside and black inside, but here there is only one map, the same for both cases.

I don t know what the parameter is positive / negative.

Greetings.

Tony

delic · Post by **delic** » Tue Mar 03, 2009 6:10 am

Hi, thx a lot !

Works fine here, on xp64 !

Really fast on loading scenes ...

For when can we expect a stable release ported to RANCH farm ?

Post by **OnoSendai** » Tue Mar 03, 2009 11:18 am

Hi Delic, the new release should be deployed on the RANCH farm fairly soon.

Big Fan · Post by **Big Fan** » Tue Mar 03, 2009 8:24 pm

BTW you seem to have missed 'applying diffraction filter' in the verbose snip..

and there still seems to be an issue with the overall exposure when using camera response in that if you fiddle with the preset menu vs. leaving the one loaded from the .igs alone it jumps to over exposed -even if you are just selecting the same preset as in the .igs. say E
It seems the menu changes are taking place and the exposure is consistant between them, its just well over exposed in comparison to the left alone case HTH

Zom-B · Post by **Zom-B** » Wed Mar 04, 2009 1:52 am

If you use a different Camera response function than the default, and touch something in the GUI, it jumps back to the default crf.... do you mean this Big Fan?

Big Fan · Post by **Big Fan** » Wed Mar 04, 2009 8:35 pm

ah no zomb but I think I found the issue -
I have an .igs with less than -5 exposure adjust set - actually -6.66 which is possible in my exporter version in certain circumstances
Indigo will load and render this just fine for that exposure until you mess with the UI presets ( or even the EV slider actually...) then it will assume the -5 value is what you set in the .igs and will not 'reset' to anything lower - hence permanently overexposed image..

couldnt extend the range a little could you ono? +-10 for instance..

I am trying to accomodate the film Iso and depth of field here - not necessarily in a true to life way, just to obtain the image I want

Indigo 1.1.17

Who is online