That's about half a second per track, isn't it? Not badWytRaven wrote:30 minutes give or take a couple of tenths.

That's about half a second per track, isn't it? Not badWytRaven wrote:30 minutes give or take a couple of tenths.
You could use ALAC (Apple Lossless) instead of FLAC. Or go for experimental: http://blowintopieces.com/fluke/WytRaven wrote:Yeah I know but (I'll admit I didn't check) as far as I know it can't read FLAC. I would also wager it would ignore the extended metadata.
Actually, in Apple linguo "Universal" means PowerPC + Intel. x86 + x64 is just a type of "fat" binary (which is less sexy for sure ;) )fused wrote:the first Universal Mac build (x86 and x64) of Indigo.
I have no comparison points, but I would think that for a processing-bound applications like Indigo the compiler should indeed be more important than the underlying OS.lyc wrote:gcc 4.3+ is said to produce FAR better code than msvc for x64.
"Simplant" looks interesting as well: http://www.neuro-systems.net/documents/simplant.htmldakiru wrote:"Substance" looks interesting
Ah Ah Ah! Perhaps we should remind our friend Neo that English is the native language of only about 6% of humanity...suvakas wrote:Hmm.. you really have no clue huh?neo0. wrote:I have no clue why foreign language is a required class..
Interesting
I'd advice everyone not to click on that link: I got contaminated by adware and scareware because I did...Borgleader wrote:Thats odd it loads fine for meI've pastebin'ed the article:
http://pastebin.org/48975