Page 1 of 3

Indigo vs Maxwell

Posted: Wed Oct 04, 2006 7:00 am
by motorsep
Which render is faster?

Posted: Wed Oct 04, 2006 7:05 am
by arneoog
Maxwell! :lol:
But just for now :twisted: hehe :roll:

Re: Indigo vs Maxwell

Posted: Wed Oct 04, 2006 7:06 am
by m1j
[quote="motorsep"]Which render is faster?[/quote]

Maxwell. But for $1000 and a team of programmers it should be. Indigo is much more flexible because it is free. I can put indigo on every computer I have and set it to rendering. If I had enough computers it would be faster than the Maxwell.

Indigo still has feature areas that are far behind maxwell. I had been very seriusly considering useing Indigo in my rendering work but had a client purchase Maxwell for me.

Posted: Wed Oct 04, 2006 7:16 am
by Kosmokrator
im maxwell user and i think indigo may be faster on some situations..believe me....indigo on interior scenes are much muuch more fast than maxwell.......indigo is a diamond of computer programming i think...total minimalisic and powerfull!future releases i think make it more and more usefull and flexible than many commercial rendering engines ( 8) )

Posted: Wed Oct 04, 2006 7:28 am
by motorsep
hmm.. On my poor PC any render is slow (except Blender's internal :lol: )
I was wondering about rendering time when people use Indigo or Maxwell for interior scenes for day light simulation (a room lit only through a window). I tried to render my interior scene with Indigo and even after 24 hrs of rendering it was still noisey :( (but it looked realistic though).

Posted: Wed Oct 04, 2006 7:57 am
by manitwo
could you run maxwell under linux? :?: :D :twisted:

Posted: Wed Oct 04, 2006 8:01 am
by Kosmokrator
hmmm well my interiors clean up with 2-3 hours of rendering....with 5 hours is totaly clean in indigo....soon i will post an interior scene i cook in indigo this days....its too clean and nice!!!indigo rules....commercian renderers sucks!!! :twisted: :evil: :twisted:

Posted: Wed Oct 04, 2006 8:09 am
by motorsep
heh, no wonder with your PC..
My PC is P4 1.4 Ghz, 512 Mb PC133 RAM :?

Posted: Wed Oct 04, 2006 8:18 am
by Kosmokrator
wow!p4 1.4ghz is the most unstable pc i have ever worked with it!my old p4 1.4 with ddr ram it crashes every hour!!! :twisted: damn intel or motherboard manufacturer or....i don know....man u need upgrade...

Posted: Wed Oct 04, 2006 8:34 am
by eman7613
133 ram, wow, i only see that in dells O.o

Posted: Wed Oct 04, 2006 1:16 pm
by motorsep
:twisted: Indeed, I have Dell, but thank God, it doesn't crush 8)
I have another box here, but mobo died in it. It was better PC: P4 2.4 Ghz with 512 Mb DDR400 RAM.

Posted: Wed Oct 04, 2006 4:11 pm
by eman7613
hope the ram & chip didnt get shoked, maybe u could switch em out (can i call em or waht? ;p ) or wait till Kentsfield comes out, well all have fun then!

Posted: Wed Oct 04, 2006 9:08 pm
by manitwo
some maxwellians recently discovered indigo:
http://www.maxwellrender.com/forum/view ... sc&start=0

on that site is a comparison between the Indigo-rendered and maxwell-rendered "IT-department" of radiance.
Tim-Ellis used different materials/textures as you will see :) Nevertheless indigo isn't the looser in this camparison,
these are both great pics, but indigo is for free and is coded by ONE man!

Posted: Wed Oct 04, 2006 9:21 pm
by OnoSendai
Maxwell is generally faster right now.
However Indigo should be speeding up quite a bit,
in particular when 0.6 is done it should be more comparable.

Posted: Wed Oct 04, 2006 9:56 pm
by rikokun
manitwo> Oh i love this T_T. They have thier forums locked so you need username to read it. I'm not sure i want to setup another account on some forums, so i can read one thread T_T