Indigo Renderer 2.0.5

[OnoSendai]

Indigo Renderer 2.0.5

This is a Beta release.
If you spot any bugs or problems, please make a post about them in this thread.
Thanks!

Indigo for Windows 32-bit:
IndigoRenderer_2.0.5_Setup.exe

Indigo for Windows 64-bit:
IndigoRenderer_x64_2.0.5_Setup.exe

Changelog:
2.0.5:
* Fixed "Error:" Bug occurring in console startup with scene command line parameter.
* Made watermark smaller for renders with width and height <= 350.
* Fixed view-dependent displacement.
* Messed with ray origin nudging a bit.

Linux Build

The GUI executable ('indigo') requires Qt 4.5 to be present.

Indigo for 32 bit Linux:
indigo_v2.0.5.tar.gz

Indigo for 64 bit Linux:
indigo_x64_v2.0.5.tar.gz

[SzLaszlo]

[quote="OnoSendai"]Indigo Renderer 2.0.5

P.S. Linux build is on the way.[/quote]

Ok :)

[zeitmeister]

I hope, the Mac version too. :-)

[suvakas]

Hey,
Thanks! Loading a scene from command line works good now.
But the image resolution still defaults to 800x600. Can you make it to read the res from scene file instead and only fall back to 800x when the resolution is over the allowed limits of the demo?

[Stromberg]

Nice, i'l try this one later :)
But Ono what about that topic i posted in the bug section, i havnt gotten any answer on that.
Well the problem is.

"When i try to enable aperture diffraction indigo gives me a error, and then stops responding, this has happend in all the scenes i have tried(Example scenes that follow with indigo)

I use 64-bit indigo on vista."

[Doug Armand]

Can confirm that the blank error message seems to have been fixed.
I can export from Blender using Blendigo 1.1.18.

Nice work

Win 7 RC x64

[fused]

Awesome!

Dont know since when thats available, but i love that one can select the camera resonse function in the ui now

[Zom-B]

I just benchmarked 2.0.5 vs 1.1.18

the old version seems to be around 10% faster!

I benchmarked the GUI version with display period of 20 and save period of 1000.
Since Indigo 2 simply ignores some values from the igs (like the both values here color temp etc.) I had to...

my test image rendered for 1500 spp took 56min 23sec on 1.1.18 and 1h 2min and 39sec on the 2.0.5 version.

Speed Improvements would be really great for the commercial version...

[CTZn]

What about the console version Zom-B, wich is faster ?

[fused]

and what about the images itself? is the noise level the same?

[Zom-B]

Noise level look quite the same... also PNG output size was nearly equal (after cuting out the logo)

Didn't tested the console version yet... will do maybe later... maybe...

The big problem about my test szenario and comaring ist, that the EnvMap light looks a little diferent from 1.1.18 to 2.0.5

Like there would be a tiny shift in the angle, or the sphere used to map the EnvMap is different in size...

[OnoSendai]

Hi all,
I've added links to the Linux build. Let me know if it works.
Thanks.

[Jambert]

[quote="OnoSendai"]Hi all,
I've added links to the Linux build. Let me know if it works.
Thanks.[/quote]

Thanks, will try it soon

[kikeonline]

[quote="OnoSendai"] Hi all,
I've added links to the Linux build. Let me know if it works.
Thanks. [/quote]


Works perfectly fine. Both 32 and 64 bit

[Jambert]

I'm running with linux 64 build, I can't run indigo
No problem with 1.1.18

jambert@debian:~/indigo$ ./indigo
./indigo: symbol lookup error: ./indigo: undefined symbol: _Z13qFlagLocationPKc