0.9 test 8 Linux build (32 and 64 bit)

WytRaven · Post by **WytRaven** » Sun Nov 18, 2007 11:07 pm

@joeiampaoli: Just tested resuming with 1.0.1 linux 64bit, hung at "Master Buffer Size".

thisisicejoe · Post by **thisisicejoe** » Thu Nov 22, 2007 5:17 am

u know what i just installed xp and i'm gonna dual boot. but yes i was cd-ing to indigo directory. hope u guys can figure it out, though i'm sure i'll be back here when i remember why i hate microsoft.

deduese · Post by **deduese** » Thu Jan 24, 2008 10:29 pm

OnoSendai wrote:For those lucky people with a 64 bit CPU,
and those running 64-bit linux,
here is a native linux x64 build of indigo.

I know this posting has been made some time ago, but it doesnt seem to cost a thing just asking

i got access to an cluster, amd64 opteron glib 2.3.6, and tried to run the 64bit-version of your test build from last year. clearly this had to fail since you used glib 2.4 and compiled it with shared libraries so i just wanted to ask whether it would to possible to compile a static build? absolutely not sure how big the results may get..

unfortunatelly wine doesnt work ether since its a 64bit-system..

psor · Post by **psor** » Thu Jan 24, 2008 10:39 pm

@deduese

Heya deduese, welcome to the forum!

Probably not what you want, but you could compile wine yourself
on your system, no? ;o))

take care
psor

deduese · Post by **deduese** » Thu Jan 24, 2008 10:56 pm

hi psor and thx

well guess what i tried so.. but the compilation fails because the gcc-toolchain on this specific system only creates 64bit-binaries (wine is a no-go on these systems) and since i'm no sysop (he doesnt care for the 32bit-folks out there) there is also no chance to setup a chroot discribed somewhere on winehq oder something like that :/

psor · Post by **psor** » Thu Jan 24, 2008 11:00 pm

Darn, ... that's sad. Hmm, ... hopefully Nik can do something about
the static build at the next stable release then.

May I ask what kinda cluster you've access to? ^^

edit: Have you tried luxrender already?

take care
psor

deduese · Post by **deduese** » Thu Jan 24, 2008 11:21 pm

psor wrote: May I ask what kinda cluster you've access to? ^^

computing cluster for theoretical physics at my university, iirc 16 x (2x dual-core opteron 2.2ghz 8gb ram each). well sometimes there isnt enough load so lets fill the gap

psor wrote: edit: Have you tried luxrender already?

well.. no

i'm glad to hear that there are more of these state-of-the-art render engines out there.. even better opensource, thx a lot i will definitly give that a try

ups but no offence to indigo, and my request still holds =)

psor · Post by **psor** » Thu Jan 24, 2008 11:25 pm

Yupp, ... I just thought until Nik will release something you can use,
why not compile your own little tool so you can fill the gap!

take care
psor

Post by **OnoSendai** » Thu Jan 24, 2008 11:37 pm

Hi Deduese,
this linux release is pretty crappy anyway, there are some deadlocks in the code.
If you wait for the v1.0.x linux release it should be better.

Labello · Post by **Labello** » Wed Mar 12, 2008 4:14 am

OnoSendai wrote:Hi Deduese,
this linux release is pretty crappy anyway, there are some deadlocks in the code.
If you wait for the v1.0.x linux release it should be better.

does this mean that we can expect a very rocking linux built in the pretty near future?

Post by **OnoSendai** » Wed Mar 12, 2008 4:22 am

Labello · Post by **Labello** » Wed Mar 12, 2008 4:39 am

OnoSendai wrote:Yes.

Brilliant news! I hate wine^^ What about Violet? afaik is it opensource isnt it? why isnt there any linux build?

dougal2 · Post by **dougal2** » Wed Mar 12, 2008 5:53 am

I did once attempt a linux violet build from the c++ version, but it didn't work properly.

The java version will work fine on linux, but it's not finished yet, and I find myself without the time, knowledge or motivation to finish it.

0.9 test 8 Linux build (32 and 64 bit)

Re: 0.9 test 8 Linux build (32 and 64 bit)

Who is online